“Lies” of the Bible (Both the chief priests and Joseph’s brothers making stuff up):
“When the chief priests had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of money, telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.’” (Matt 28:12). Commentary: (Here, “a scene of great irony occurs when the priests in their frustration are forced to bribe the guards to propound the very lie that they had begged Pilate to prevent” (See Matt 27:64) Grant Osborne, Hermeneutical Spiral, 217).
Grant R. Osborne, The Hermeneutical Spiral : A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, Rev. and expanded, 2nd ed. (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2006), 217.
“When Joseph’s brothers saw that their father was dead, they said, “What if Joseph holds a grudge against us and pays us back for all the wrongs we did to him?” So they sent word to Joseph, saying, “Your father left these instructions before he died: ‘This is what you are to say to Joseph: I ask you to forgive your brothers the sins and the wrongs they committed in treating you so badly.’ Now please forgive the sins of the servants of the God of your father.” When their message came to him, Joseph wept.” (Gen 50:15-17).
Posture of prayer:
Prayer: on knees (Ezra 9.5, Eph 3.14, etc), lying prostrate (Num 16.45, etc); head between knees (1 Kgs 18.42); standing ( (1 Sam 1.26; Luke 18.11, 13, etc).
Is the Church the New Israel?:
“Care must be taken not to make Gentiles a part of Israel. There is a delicate balance between what applies specifically to the nation Israel and what applies to the church…Acts 3:19-21 clearly indicates that there will be a time future to our day when the covenants will be fulfilled literally. Furthermore…(we cannot make) the church the “new Israel,” (since)… this is contrary to the whole point of Eph 2:11-22 where the “new person” is distinct from the nation Israel. Gentiles do not become Jews but rather Jews and Gentiles become “one new person.” The church is not the new Israel but a distinct body of believers made up of believing Jews and Gentiles….some take the covenants of promise literally. In this case however, only those promises restated in the NT apply to the church and those that are not mentioned apply to the nation Israel and are yet to be fulfilled. There is no indication in the NT that the land primses made to Israel are for the chruch’s possession…This…seems to fit best with the facts presented in the NT” (Harold Hoehner, Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 447-448).
The Christian and the OT Law?:
“…by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace” (Eph 2:15). (Referring to Eph. 2:15) “Since the whole Mosaic law has been rendered inoperative for Jewish and Gentile believers in Christ, it is a false dichotomy to distinguish between the moral and ceremonial laws, making only the ceremonial laws inoperative…Christ is the end of the whole law for believers (Rom 10:4) and we as believers are no longer under that pedagogue (Gal 3:25)…In fact, we have died to the law (Rom 7:1-6). Does this mean that there are no laws in the Mosaic law that the believer of today is obligated to obey? Only those that have been reiterated in the NT. We are under the new covenant, and the old covenant has been done away. It is no longer our modus operandi” (Harold Hoehner, Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 376-377).
Jesus’ Spiritual Kingdom:
“The Jews had expected God to bring in his physical kingdom, but the disciples learned that this kingdom would first appear in a spiritual form beginning with Jesus’ ministry and last until his return to set up that expected apocalyptic physical kingdom, which will include the judgment of the wicked and the vindication of the righteous” (Harold Hoehner, Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 430).
Apparent Contradiction (needs study to resolve…)
Paul: 23,000 died (1 Cor. 10:8). Yet, 24,000 died (Num. 25.9, and all known Jewish sources). Round number maybe?…
Lack of “in Christ” in Acts:
“What we find notably lacking in Acts is the Pauline idea of being “in Christ” or being participants in his body or the notion or Christ’s preexistence…” Why? “A variety of texts stress that Jesus is in heaven” (though appears in visions, like Stephen or Paul (2.33, 3.21, 9.3, 22.6, 26.13)… “This is why the sending of the Spirit is so crucial in Acts…If Jesus is absent, the church must have some source of power and direction, and this they receive from the Spirit. God now acts by means of the Spirit or an angel on earth…” Ben Witherington III, The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary, 151-152.
Being Sent:
Holy Spirit: twice “sent,” or “given,” by the Father (Jn 14:16, 26) and twice by the Son (Jn 15:26; 16:7)…The final stage is seen when the disciples/believers themselves are described as “sent ones” (Jn 17:18; 20:21) (Grant Osborne, Hermeneutical Spiral, 437).
Humility of Paul:
Apparently over time, Paul becomes more and more humble. In 1 Cor 15:9 he states that he is the “least of the apostles.” In a later letter he stated that he was the “very least of all the saints” (Eph 3:8). And finally, in a still later letter, he stated that he was the “worst of sinners.” (1 Tim 1:16).
Recent Comments